Am I missing something here? Does Supply Risk Management come down to plain and simple common sense? I don’t mind authors who use propositions in their articles; it usually shows that they have a pretty good grip on their subject. Besides, it adds structure and focus. In their 2004 paper, Securing the upstream supply chain: a risk management approach, Larry C Guinipero and Reham A Eltantawy put forward and explore four propositions reflecting four situational factors that should govern supply risk management. However, as I see it, not only are these propositions not fully exploited, they appear to be little more than basic common sense, or is it me who is way off?







2010/07/11 : WCTR 2010
2010/07/01 : Mitigating Supply Chain Vulnerability
2010/06/23 : Humanitarian Relief Supply Chains
2010/06/14 : How Norwegian freight carriers handle supply chain disruptions
2010/05/03 : Risk and Vulnerability in Virtual Enterprise Networks
2010/04/30 : What goes into resilience?
2010/04/29 : Pay more get more?
2010/04/24 : Volcanic ash cloud – really a surprise?