2010/03/10 
from the LITERATURE 
A promising title with promising content? Perhaps. If you are a supply chain or logistics professional, looking for a paper that discusses the intricacies of managing a supply chain in a disaster area, how to prepare and how to recover, this is NOT it. However, if you are a supply chain or logistics academic or researcher, looking for a new research strand or looking for a new theoretical approach to preparedness and recovery, then yes, this is it. The supply chain crisis and disaster pyramid by R. Glenn Richey Jr is a paper that falls in the category of academically intriguing, but practically maybe not so. That said, it may very well be a future seminal paper in supply chain disaster preparedness and recovery.
|
||||
|
All posts in
|
 husdal.com is a gateway to literature reviews of journal articles, research papers, books, websites and other resources in Supply Chain Risk, Business Continuity, and Transport Vulnerability, personally collected and reviewed by Jan Husdal.
 |
||
|
husdal.com © 1999-2010 | About | Contact | Copyright | Privacy | Disclosure | Comments? | Advertise? | Linkback? 
|
||||
Can contingency planning increase flexibility and minimize risk exposure to supply chain disruptions? Obviously yes, but what is it about the contingency planning process that relates to flexibility? That question is asked by Joseph B Skipper and Joe B Hanna in Minimizing supply chain disruption risk through enhanced flexibility. Surprisingly, this article suggests that only very few variables of contingency planning are positively related to flexibility…puzzling, isn’t it?
How do you prepare a supply chain for a crisis, and how do you manage a supply chain when the unexpected hits you? While not providing a direct answer to this question, a group of researchers from the Texas A&M University, has scoured some 118 peer-reviewed and published articles and come up a classification scheme I think is excellent. In Managing supply chains in times of crisis: a review of literature and insights, the three, Arunachalam Narayanan, Ismail Capar and Malini Natarajarathinam use 5 factors and 15 subfactors to separate the chaff from the wheat.
My latest acquaintance in supply chain risk research methodology is developing drivers and dependants using interpretive structural modelling (ISM). A good example was provided by the trio of Mohd Nishat Faisal, D.K. Banwet, and Ravi Shankar, which I presented last week when I reviewed their paper on 
Can public-private partnerships improve community resilience? This question is posed in Leveraging public-private partnerships to improve community resilience in times of disaster, written in 2009 by Geoffrey Stewart, Ramesh Kolluru and Mark Smith, three researchers from the National Incident Management Systems and Advanced Technologies Institute (NIMSAT). The answer: In order to achieve community resilience public and private owners of critical infrastructures and key resources must work together, before, during and after a disaster.
2010/07/11 : WCTR 2010
2010/07/01 : Mitigating Supply Chain Vulnerability
2010/06/23 : Humanitarian Relief Supply Chains
2010/06/19 : The causes of logistics uncertainty
2010/06/14 : How Norwegian freight carriers handle supply chain disruptions
2010/06/11 : State of the art in SCRM?
2010/05/03 : Risk and Vulnerability in Virtual Enterprise Networks
2010/04/30 : What goes into resilience?
2010/04/29 : Pay more get more?
2010/04/24 : Volcanic ash cloud – really a surprise?