Community resilience in times of disaster

Can public-private partnerships improve community resilience? This question is posed in Leveraging public-private partnerships to improve community resilience in times of disaster, written in 2009 by Geoffrey Stewart, Ramesh Kolluru and Mark Smith, three researchers from the National Incident Management Systems and Advanced Technologies Institute (NIMSAT). The answer: In order to achieve community resilience public and private owners of critical infrastructures and key resources must work together, before, during and after a disaster.

Interdependence

The social and economic networks that exist in any community will ultimately influence the ability of this community to adapt to and respond to the consequences of disasters.  This includes both private and public entities.

Stewart, G., Kolluru, R., & Smith, M. (2009). Leveraging public-private partnerships to improve community resilience in times of disaster. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39 (5), 343-364

The key issue is to recognize and embrace the public-private interfaces that can improve the ability of a community to manage the response and recovery phases of disaster management.

Conceptualized as a dependent variable, community resilience is influenced by the relationships government (public) agencies develop with private sector partners and the resilience of relevant supply chains and critical infrastructures/key resources which exist in their communities.

Why is this important? Because much of the critical infrastructure  necessary for a disaster response is in private, not in public hands. This will of course depend on which country that is struck by a disaster, but in much of Europe and particularly in the US, it is true.

Propositions

The authors set up a list of propositions

  • Stronger public-private partnerships will positively influence the capability of participating critical infrastructure and key resource operators to manage disaster consequences.
  • Stronger public-private partnerships will positively influence the capability of participating supply chain operators to manage disaster consequences.
  • Improvements in the resilience of critical infrastructures and key resources will positively improve supply chain resilience.
  • Improvements in the resilience of supply chains will positively improve  the resilience of critical infrastructures and key resources.
  • Through improved access to resources, supply chain resilience will positively influence the capability of communities to manage the consequences of disasters.
  • Through improved access to resources, the resilience of critical infrastructures and key resources will positively influence the capability of communities to manage the consequences of disasters.

and underpin each proposition with a wealth of examples and a selection of relevant literature.

Managerial implications

The authors also evaluate how resilience can and should be developed.

1. Resilience needs to take center stage:

Failure to recognize the role of resilience could compound post-disaster consequences by relying on managers and public policy officials who who are not capable of adapting the most well-intended plans into strategies which are appropriate for the given situation.

2. Don’t forget the mortality rate of businesses following a disaster:

At each level of government, measures must be taken to influence the preparedness of businesses.

3. Identify important supply chains and critical infrastructures and key resources:

Starting at the lowest level, it is important to understand the position and relative importance of the assets of a community, both on a local, regional and  national level.

4. Establish appropriate relationships with specific business/industries:

First, understand how specific businesses and government agencies work, then develop working relationships in order to discuss the remedies that can contribute to improving resilience.

The essence: In order to achieve community resilience, public and private owners of critical infrastructures and key resources must work together, before, during and after a disaster.

Critique

This is one of the better articles on resilience that I have seen in the long time, but there is one shortcoming, in my opinion. While the authors describe and discuss various aspects of the concept of resilience,  I find it surprising that they missed the New Zealand research project Resilient Organisations, that deals in particular with community resilience. Instead they appear to have a penchant for Sheffi’s concepts of resilience, which, by the way, are brilliant, so there’s nothing wrong with that. Moreover, they do cite a wide range of literature, many of which hitherto unbeknown to me, so I do have a lot of reading ahead of me, and that alone makes this article worth reading.

NIMSAT

NIMSAT is a research center established under the auspices of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette and that was conceived based on the experiences of the Institute’s researchers during the devastations of hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005. The mission of NIMSAT is to enhance national resiliency to a full range of potential disasters by conducting research leading to innovative tools and applications that empower the homeland security and emergency management community through education, training, outreach and operational support.

Reference

Stewart, G., Kolluru, R., & Smith, M. (2009). Leveraging public-private partnerships to improve community resilience in times of disaster. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39 (5), 343-364 DOI: 10.1108/09600030910973724

Author links

  • louisiana.edu: Geoffrey T Stewart
  • linkedin.com: Ramesh Kolluru
  • nimsat.org: Mark Smith

Links

Related

Jan Husdal is an engineer turned researcher turned engineer again and he is now a Resilience Adviser with the Southern Region office of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration (Statens vegvesen Region sør) in Arendal, Norway,

Posted in ARTICLES and PAPERS
Tags: , , , , , ,
ARTICLES and PAPERS
Flexing your SCM muscles
supply-chain-flexibility
A supply chain is never stronger than its weakest link, and that (having a weak link) is perhaps the[...]
Mitigating supply chain disruptions
preparing-for-disaster
How could I have missed this paper? I was preparing my 2009-lecture on supply chain risk for tomorro[...]
Are supply and demand elasticity a risk?
supply-chain-dynamics
Why haven't I seen this paper before? And why is it not cited more often? It should. It is called Th[...]
BOOKS and BOOK CHAPTERS
Book Review: Creative Destruction
creative-distruction
Like with so many of my other recent book reviews I came across Nolan and Croson's book, Creative De[...]
Low Cost Country Sourcing
supply-chain-risks-low-cost-country-sourcing
Low-cost countries. A dream for some and a nightmare for other others. What are typical supply chain[...]
Book Review: Research Methodologies in SCM
research-methodologies-scm
Is there something like the right research design for supply chain studies? I believe there is, and [...]
REPORTS and WHITEPAPERS
ISO 28002 – Supply Chain Resilience
iso-28002
Have you heard of ISO 28002?  No? You should take note of this standard, because the ISO 28000 serie[...]
Hiperos - the Integrated View of Supplier Risk
hiperos-supplier-risk
Supply chains have gone global. No longer are they a point-to-chain of goods flowing from a source t[...]
Assess the vulnerability of your production system
vulnerability-production-system
So far I have reviewed "international" literature and web sites, and it is only fitting that now it [...]