<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Security and continuity of supply</title> <atom:link href="http://www.husdal.com/2010/01/06/security-of-supply/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.husdal.com/2010/01/06/security-of-supply/</link> <description>Journal articles and papers, books and book chapters, research reports and whitepapers, blogs and websites</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Jan Husdal</title><link>http://www.husdal.com/2010/01/06/security-of-supply/#comment-9746</link> <dc:creator>Jan Husdal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:23:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.husdal.com/?p=9887#comment-9746</guid> <description>John, you will have to forgive for being ignorant, but I&#039;m not sure I fully comprehend the economic theory behind the &quot;liquidationist mode&quot;. I was able to find out there was an article over at the Christian Science Monitor on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/1118/does-us-need-a-second-stimulus-to-create-jobs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Does the US need a second stimulus to create jobs&lt;/a&gt;? that sparked some debate, e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/11/stop-the-madness-now.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stop the Madness Now!&lt;/a&gt; at the Naked Capitalism blog, where it was said that no stimulus equals liquidationist mode. But I&#039;m still in the dark as to how security of supply and economic stimulus relates to each other? Unless...no stimulus equals the liquidation of businesses equals less supply base equals less security of supply.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, you will have to forgive for being ignorant, but I&#8217;m not sure I fully comprehend the economic theory behind the &#8220;liquidationist mode&#8221;. I was able to find out there was an article over at the Christian Science Monitor on <a
href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/1118/does-us-need-a-second-stimulus-to-create-jobs" rel="nofollow">Does the US need a second stimulus to create jobs</a>? that sparked some debate, e.g. <a
href="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/11/stop-the-madness-now.html" rel="nofollow">Stop the Madness Now!</a> at the Naked Capitalism blog, where it was said that no stimulus equals liquidationist mode. But I&#8217;m still in the dark as to how security of supply and economic stimulus relates to each other? Unless&#8230;no stimulus equals the liquidation of businesses equals less supply base equals less security of supply.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Ryskamp</title><link>http://www.husdal.com/2010/01/06/security-of-supply/#comment-9734</link> <dc:creator>John Ryskamp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:07:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.husdal.com/?p=9887#comment-9734</guid> <description>This doesn&#039;t answer the basic question:
what happens  to security of supply when the society is in liquidationist mode?  That&#039;s the issue facing the world now.  CERTAINLY it is the issue facing the United States.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t answer the basic question:</p><p>what happens  to security of supply when the society is in liquidationist mode?  That&#8217;s the issue facing the world now.  CERTAINLY it is the issue facing the United States.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.husdal.com/2010/01/06/security-of-supply/feed/ ) in 0.32467 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 5:42 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 1:42 am UTC -->
