<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Risk &amp; Vulnerability</title> <atom:link href="http://www.husdal.com/2009/12/04/risk-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.husdal.com/2009/12/04/risk-vulnerability/</link> <description>Journal articles and papers, books and book chapters, research reports and whitepapers, blogs and websites</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Jan Husdal</title><link>http://www.husdal.com/2009/12/04/risk-vulnerability/#comment-111334</link> <dc:creator>Jan Husdal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:03:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.husdal.com/?p=8797#comment-111334</guid> <description>Dear Pavan,
Thank you for your compliments and I am glad to see that my blog is helpful to you. That in itself is the best compliment I can get.
As to defining risk, you are right.
Some prefer to call it uncertainty, because in most cases that is what it is trying to express. And if the outcome of a &quot;harmful&quot; event or situation is certain, then there is no risk (&lt;a href=&quot;http://&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aven, 2009&lt;/a&gt;). Some say that unless an event or a situation can actually harm you, that event contains no risk, meaning that if you have preventive or mitigative measures in place (and if they work, presumably), then there is no risk involved. Some also link the uncertainty in the calculations of risk to the risk (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.husdal.com/2010/04/09/risk-versus-vulnerability/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aven, 2007&lt;/a&gt;).
There is indeed a plethora of differing risk definitions, as the book on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.husdal.com/2010/10/13/book-review-security-risk-management/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Security Risk Management&lt;/a&gt; shows.
As to supply chains, supply chain &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.husdal.com/2010/03/29/shrink-shrank-shrunk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;uncertainty&lt;/a&gt;, supply chain &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.husdal.com/tag/supply-chain-turbulence/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;turbulence&lt;/a&gt; and supply chain &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.husdal.com/2011/02/21/supply-chain-turbulence/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;volatility&lt;/a&gt; used as &quot;substitutes&quot; for risk, which is perhaps a better description in particular cases, but not on a wide basis.
Risk, ultimately has the widest scope, and I don&#039;t think the word &lt;em&gt;risk&lt;/em&gt; is going to go away that soon, even though there could be a more accurate word.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Pavan,</p><p>Thank you for your compliments and I am glad to see that my blog is helpful to you. That in itself is the best compliment I can get.</p><p>As to defining risk, you are right.</p><p>Some prefer to call it uncertainty, because in most cases that is what it is trying to express. And if the outcome of a &#8220;harmful&#8221; event or situation is certain, then there is no risk (<a
href="http://" rel="nofollow">Aven, 2009</a>). Some say that unless an event or a situation can actually harm you, that event contains no risk, meaning that if you have preventive or mitigative measures in place (and if they work, presumably), then there is no risk involved. Some also link the uncertainty in the calculations of risk to the risk (<a
href="http://www.husdal.com/2010/04/09/risk-versus-vulnerability/" rel="nofollow">Aven, 2007</a>).</p><p>There is indeed a plethora of differing risk definitions, as the book on <a
href="http://www.husdal.com/2010/10/13/book-review-security-risk-management/" rel="nofollow">Security Risk Management</a> shows.</p><p>As to supply chains, supply chain <a
href="http://www.husdal.com/2010/03/29/shrink-shrank-shrunk/" rel="nofollow">uncertainty</a>, supply chain <a
href="http://www.husdal.com/tag/supply-chain-turbulence/" rel="nofollow">turbulence</a> and supply chain <a
href="http://www.husdal.com/2011/02/21/supply-chain-turbulence/" rel="nofollow">volatility</a> used as &#8220;substitutes&#8221; for risk, which is perhaps a better description in particular cases, but not on a wide basis.</p><p>Risk, ultimately has the widest scope, and I don&#8217;t think the word <em>risk</em> is going to go away that soon, even though there could be a more accurate word.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pavan</title><link>http://www.husdal.com/2009/12/04/risk-vulnerability/#comment-111274</link> <dc:creator>Pavan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:43:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.husdal.com/?p=8797#comment-111274</guid> <description>Dear Jan Husdal,
I am currently studying my Master&#039;s, really the information provided by you here is wonderful and its very helpful. But I do have some doubt, what is a risk in a supply chain perspective actually, as far as I am concerned risk is everywhere right, so is it a better idea to call it by any other word?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jan Husdal,</p><p>I am currently studying my Master&#8217;s, really the information provided by you here is wonderful and its very helpful. But I do have some doubt, what is a risk in a supply chain perspective actually, as far as I am concerned risk is everywhere right, so is it a better idea to call it by any other word?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jan Husdal</title><link>http://www.husdal.com/2009/12/04/risk-vulnerability/#comment-22998</link> <dc:creator>Jan Husdal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:05:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.husdal.com/?p=8797#comment-22998</guid> <description>You&#039;re most welcome, domy. I&#039;m glad I was able to help you. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;re most welcome, domy. I&#039;m glad I was able to help you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: domy</title><link>http://www.husdal.com/2009/12/04/risk-vulnerability/#comment-22230</link> <dc:creator>domy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:07:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.husdal.com/?p=8797#comment-22230</guid> <description>thank you for your information here,
i have learned much about risk and vulnerability,
i am working with risk in coffee supply chain now, and using vulnerability analysis for coffee farmers,
but actually i did not understand much about the difference of risk and vulnerability,
after visiting your website, i can take some ideas and understand the methodology to analysis each of them.
thank you,
domy </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for your information here,</p><p>i have learned much about risk and vulnerability,</p><p>i am working with risk in coffee supply chain now, and using vulnerability analysis for coffee farmers,</p><p>but actually i did not understand much about the difference of risk and vulnerability,</p><p>after visiting your website, i can take some ideas and understand the methodology to analysis each of them.</p><p>thank you,</p><p>domy</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jan Husdal</title><link>http://www.husdal.com/2009/12/04/risk-vulnerability/#comment-7315</link> <dc:creator>Jan Husdal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:52:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.husdal.com/?p=8797#comment-7315</guid> <description>What can I say? Great minds think alike? Well, I&#039;m glad this article was helpful.
The only other reference that comes to my mind immediately is the New Zealand research project Resilient Organisations, but I see you already have that on your blog.
I&#039;ll dig through my archive of articles to see if I can come up with something similar. Today&#039;s article had been lying in my file cabinet for quite a while, and I re-discovered it just few days ago, so perhaps there are other resilience gems, too. I know that I have some more articles with a disruption profile in it.
I&#039;ll get back to you as soon as I can.
BTW, you do have a great blog, which one day I would like feature.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say? Great minds think alike? Well, I&#8217;m glad this article was helpful.</p><p>The only other reference that comes to my mind immediately is the New Zealand research project Resilient Organisations, but I see you already have that on your blog.</p><p>I&#8217;ll dig through my archive of articles to see if I can come up with something similar. Today&#8217;s article had been lying in my file cabinet for quite a while, and I re-discovered it just few days ago, so perhaps there are other resilience gems, too. I know that I have some more articles with a disruption profile in it.</p><p>I&#8217;ll get back to you as soon as I can.</p><p>BTW, you do have a great blog, which one day I would like feature.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ken Simpson</title><link>http://www.husdal.com/2009/12/04/risk-vulnerability/#comment-7306</link> <dc:creator>Ken Simpson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:46:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.husdal.com/?p=8797#comment-7306</guid> <description>Just last night I was reading some other work on this idea of resilience and vulnerability as opposite sides of the same coin. Similar sentiment that it really cannot be assessed without extreme stress (or the real thing happening).
Really great that this came up in my RSS feed today! Thanks for this review. I will be referencing this in my own blog post today.
Do you have any other references on the same subject you can suggest? I have Sheffi - but would be keen to get some leads while I try to source the work you reviewed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just last night I was reading some other work on this idea of resilience and vulnerability as opposite sides of the same coin. Similar sentiment that it really cannot be assessed without extreme stress (or the real thing happening).</p><p>Really great that this came up in my RSS feed today! Thanks for this review. I will be referencing this in my own blog post today.</p><p>Do you have any other references on the same subject you can suggest? I have Sheffi &#8211; but would be keen to get some leads while I try to source the work you reviewed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.husdal.com/2009/12/04/risk-vulnerability/feed/ ) in 1.19383 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 5:45 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 1:45 am UTC -->
