Less supply chain disruptions with vendor managed inventory?

How does a traditional supply chain compare to a vendor managed inventory supply chain when it comes to performance during disruptions? In her 2005 paper, The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance, Martha Wilson found out, not surprisingly, that vendor managed inventory (VMI) fares better than the traditional retail managed inventory, even when looking at the whole supply chain: Raw Material Supplier – Tier 2 Supplier   – Tier 1 Supplier  – Warehouse – Retailer – Customer.

The model

The model used in this simulation is traditional 5-echelon supply chain:

  • Customer
  • Retailer
  • Warehouse
  • Tier 1 Supplier (Subassembly > Final)
  • Tier 2 Supplier (Raw Materials > Subassembly)
  • Raw Material Supplier

In the traditional supply chain setup the orders  flows from top to bottom, and the goods flow from bottom to top.

martha-wilson-model

In a vendor managed inventory setup, customer demand numbers are passed directly to the tier 1 supplier, who then ships to the warehouse for distribution by the retailer, while sending backorders to the tier 2 supplier, according to customer demand.

Four scenarios

How does this different setup impact transportation disruptions between the four possible types of disruption: retailer-warehouse, warehouse-tier1, tier1-tier2, tier2-raw materials?

Four parameters

Four parameters are chosen as to determine performance measures:

  • Retail Inventory
  • Warehouse inventory
  • Subassembly goods in transit
  • Raw materials in transit

The performance measures are

  • Unfilled retail customer orders
  • Maximum number of goods in transit
  • Maxiumum inventory level
  • Average inventory level

These measures are then investigated in relation to the four scenarios.

Results

All scenario results are clearly displayed in separate diagrams and tables, some of which I summarized in the garph left here. It is clear that the different disruptions have different impacts throughout the supply chain.

wilson-results1

Click image for larger version

However, a VMI setup has less impact, particular at the warehouse and retailer level, indicating that a disruption here is better served by a VMI setup than the traditional setup.

Critique

The simulation does have some constraints: 1) The models are run for 600 days with a 10-day disruption occurring at day 200. Hence, this is only one of many possible scenarios. 2) The model assumes a straightforward 5-echelon supply chain with no complex or interlinked structures. Thus, it oversimplifies, but it does give a picture or an idea of what happens where and can be an excellent starting point for further investigations.

Conclusion

Initially I posed the question Less supply chain disruptions with vendor managed inventory? The correct question should have been Less impact of supply chain disruptions with vendor managed inventory? Given the constraints and simplifications of this simulation, the answer to that question is certainly yes.

References

WILSON, M. (2007). The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43 (4), 295-320 DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.008

Author link

Related

Jan Husdal is an engineer turned researcher turned engineer again and he is now a Resilience Adviser with the Southern Region office of the Norwegian Public Roads Administration (Statens vegvesen Region sør) in Arendal, Norway,

Posted in ARTICLES and PAPERS
Tags: , , , , , ,
ARTICLES and PAPERS
Lean + Agile = LeAgile: a happy marriage?
lean-agile-leagile
Opposites attract and in the supply chain world, "lean" and "agile" appear to be opposites. Both man[...]
A new supply chain perspective: The supply chain life cycle
wei-deng-solvang
It is not often that I come across papers with a holistic view of the supply chain as a living and d[...]
Inbound and outbound vulnerability
goran-svensson-inbound-outbound-vulnerability
After publishing A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains, Gøran Sv[...]
BOOKS and BOOK CHAPTERS
SME Risk Management
sme-risk-management
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) make up the majority of enterprises in most countries, and[...]
Book Review: Single Point of Failure
single-point-of-failure
Just out a few days ago, Single Point of Failure is a fascinating read. The author, Gary S. Lynch, i[...]
Resilience times four
hollnagel-resilience-engineering
Resilience. It is not so much about reducing the number of things that go wrong, but it is about imp[...]
REPORTS and WHITEPAPERS
Saving Norway's crumbling infrastructure
NTP 2010-2019
Following up my post this morning called "D-Day for Norway's Transport Infrastructure", the numbers [...]
The supply chain of the future
mckinsey-supply-chain-of-the-future
Many global supply chains are not equipped to cope with the world we are entering. Most were enginee[...]
Managing supply chain risk
economist-supply-chain-risk-report
In September and October 2009 the Economist Intelligence Unit surveyed 500 company executives with r[...]