How are companies located in sparse transport networks affected by supply chain disruptions? Here is a copy of the paper I presented at TRB2009, the Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, in Washington, DC, 11-15 January 2009. The paper was presented in a poster session and included as a full paper in the conference proceedings. For your convenience, both the paper and the poster are included below.
Reference
Husdal, J. (2009). Does location matter? Supply chain disruptions in sparse transportation networks. Paper presented at the TRB Annual Meeting, washington DC, 11 January 2009.
Abstract
This paper serves as a conceptual gateway for further research into supply chain disruptions in sparse transportation networks.
Disruptions of the supply chain are of particular interest in countries or regions with sparse transportation networks. Here, the supply chain can not be structured freely, but is limited by constraints, and with only a few transportation modes and links available between communities, they become extremely vulnerable, since in a worst-case scenario no suitable alternative exists for deliveries to or from communities. Thus, the structure or design of the supply chain, along with the organization and preparedness become important factors in determining if a company has a favorable or an unfavorable location.
The question then arises, are businesses located in regions with sparse transportation networks more prone to supply chain disruptions than businesses located in more favorable locations? Does a sparse transportation network constrain the supply chain setup, such that it is more vulnerable and more likely to be disrupted?
The paper develops a new framework for the categorization of supply chains, based on the number of links and modes available in the transportation network, where sparse transportation networks can be categorized as constrained supply chains with an unfavorable supply chain setup. Within the constrained supply chain framework, a company can address its locational disadvantage by either redesigning the supply chain towards a better structure, in order to gain better location, or by redesigning the supply chain towards a better organization, in order to gain better preparedness.
Poster
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Full paper
Related
- husdal.com: Location, location, location
- husdal.com: Does location matter?
- husdal.com: TRB2009 – are you going there?
- husdal.com: Are roads more important than computers?
More from husdal.com
Are you presenting at the TRB 2009, the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting? Personally ...
In regions or countries with sparse transportation networks or few transportation mode choices ...
Albeit many supply chains make use of more than one, if not all modes of transport, the vulnerab ...
How are companies located in sparse transport networks affected by supply chain disruptions? Thi ...
The vulnerability of the transportation network as part of the supply chain is of particular int ...





























2010/09/02: Book Review: Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management
2010/08/28: Importance and Exposure – Measures of Road Network Vulnerability?
2010/08/27: Logipi – why you should listen to it
2010/08/26: The ISCRIM Newsletter 1/2010
2010/08/25: Blog Supply Chain Risk: Writer’s Block
2010/08/24: Next time in China: Guanxi
2010/08/23: Supply Chain Risk: Culture Shock
2010/08/04: Book Review: Humanitarian Logistics
2010/07/11: WCTR 2010